Best Known (64, 64+58, s)-Nets in Base 16
(64, 64+58, 520)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 122, 520)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 61, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
(64, 64+58, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (64, 122, 642)-net over F16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (64, 124, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 62, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 62, 321)-net over F256, using
(64, 64+58, 90482)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 122, 90483)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 799 406999 079721 960469 857109 476085 138013 835493 667757 306320 620605 411258 706776 648642 905272 321920 801009 220358 066376 827487 416543 577644 414844 099217 797456 > 16122 [i]