Best Known (65, 65+58, s)-Nets in Base 16
(65, 65+58, 520)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 123, 520)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (65, 124, 520)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 62, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 62, 260)-net over F256, using
(65, 65+58, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (65, 123, 642)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (65, 126, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 63, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 63, 321)-net over F256, using
(65, 65+58, 99561)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 123, 99562)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 12789 034526 796657 715669 705618 089533 466507 846901 821240 533112 779174 162213 733641 605396 387715 499852 867059 460477 184533 895978 938173 759585 639212 243134 401896 > 16123 [i]