Best Known (126−59, 126, s)-Nets in Base 16
(126−59, 126, 522)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (67, 126, 522)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 63, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
(126−59, 126, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (67, 126, 642)-net over F16, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (67, 130, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 65, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 65, 321)-net over F256, using
(126−59, 126, 120544)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (67, 126, 120545)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (67, 125, 120545)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 3 274153 822695 020966 761473 546056 886115 670021 277623 087048 385364 792561 941128 939200 237174 255658 921534 236059 903554 855937 265794 815132 593694 630943 965824 180576 > 16125 [i]