MinT - Best Known (90−59, 90, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (90−59, 90, s)-Nets in Base 16

(90−59, 90, 65)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (31, 90, 65)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 90, 65)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
    - the Hermitian function field over F₁₆ [i]

(90−59, 90, 120)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive

(31, 90, 120)-net in base 16, using

10 times m-reduction [i] based on (31, 100, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 80, 120)-net over F₃₂, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F₃₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(90−59, 90, 168)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (31, 90, 168)-net over F₁₆, using

net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 167)-sequence over F₁₆, using
- Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 168, using
  - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(90−59, 90, 3842)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (31, 90, 3843)-net in base 16, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (31, 89, 3843)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16^mÂ â‰¥ 147097 311336 219835 289730 919557 903686 482714 461705 901201 798579 635452 619757 211432 256303 985437 668102 370071 165056 > 16⁸⁹ [i]