MinT - Best Known (93−61, 93, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (93−61, 93, s)-Nets in Base 16

(93−61, 93, 65)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (32, 93, 65)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 93, 65)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
    - the Hermitian function field over F₁₆ [i]

(93−61, 93, 120)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive

(32, 93, 120)-net in base 16, using

12 times m-reduction [i] based on (32, 105, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 84, 120)-net over F₃₂, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F₃₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(93−61, 93, 168)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (32, 93, 168)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (31, 93, 168)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 167)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 168, using
    - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(93−61, 93, 3940)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (32, 93, 3941)-net in base 16, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (32, 92, 3941)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16^mÂ â‰¥ 604 851242 158435 364918 383668 605825 623381 962455 620584 043426 808150 400220 032023 571101 847120 805270 214193 691215 502576 > 16⁹² [i]