Best Known (26, 26+64, s)-Nets in Base 16
(26, 26+64, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 90, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 90, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(26, 26+64, 98)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(26, 90, 98)-net in base 16, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (26, 95, 98)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 76, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 76, 98)-net over F32, using
(26, 26+64, 150)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (26, 90, 150)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 149)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
(26, 26+64, 2059)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 90, 2060)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 380692 491024 153587 426421 169818 085190 168508 585268 771710 340424 632114 122133 977756 108416 643680 232849 840778 026176 > 1690 [i]