Best Known (25, 25+68, s)-Nets in Base 16
(25, 25+68, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (25, 93, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 93, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(25, 25+68, 76)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(25, 93, 76)-net in base 16, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on (25, 100, 76)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 80, 76)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 80, 76)-net over F32, using
(25, 25+68, 144)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (25, 93, 144)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 143)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 25 and N(F) ≥ 144, using
(25, 25+68, 1755)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (25, 93, 1756)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 9712 471940 947426 219771 778476 245060 770314 506217 960579 089650 574069 196199 101212 783056 139937 453479 169041 547074 244786 > 1693 [i]