Best Known (9, 9+7, s)-Nets in Base 16
(9, 9+7, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (9, 16, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 8, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
(9, 9+7, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (9, 16, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 8, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
(9, 9+7, 127024)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (9, 16, 127025)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (9, 15, 127025)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 1 152928 687918 107376 > 1615 [i]