MinT - Best Known (98−71, 98, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (98−71, 98, s)-Nets in Base 16

(98−71, 98, 65)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (27, 98, 65)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 98, 65)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
    - the Hermitian function field over F₁₆ [i]

(98−71, 98, 98)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive

(27, 98, 98)-net in base 16, using

2 times m-reduction [i] based on (27, 100, 98)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 80, 98)-net over F₃₂, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F₃₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(98−71, 98, 156)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (27, 98, 156)-net over F₁₆, using

net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 155)-sequence over F₁₆, using
- Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 27 and N(F) ≥ 156, using
  - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(98−71, 98, 1995)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (27, 98, 1996)-net in base 16, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 97, 1996)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16^mÂ â‰¥ 632 054092 978235 051629 353010 247153 156226 837761 395354 059433 488418 040481 287180 267735 607267 546530 678150 235259 497833 265526 > 16⁹⁷ [i]