Best Known (29, 29+71, s)-Nets in Base 16
(29, 29+71, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 100, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 100, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(29, 29+71, 104)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(29, 100, 104)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 80, 104)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
(29, 29+71, 161)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (29, 100, 161)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 160)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 29 and N(F) ≥ 161, using
(29, 29+71, 2341)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 100, 2342)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 99, 2342)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 161887 406941 007151 864855 320088 776011 178399 115676 442097 097167 928019 629088 373373 776386 458688 574753 491236 365344 309934 719926 > 1699 [i]