Best Known (100−73, 100, s)-Nets in Base 16
(100−73, 100, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 100, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 100, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(100−73, 100, 98)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(27, 100, 98)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 80, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
(100−73, 100, 156)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (27, 100, 156)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 155)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 27 and N(F) ≥ 156, using
(100−73, 100, 1929)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 100, 1930)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 99, 1930)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 161729 586156 384840 023606 640637 629734 214933 176587 884534 736615 392303 265581 197665 236526 882866 560600 909915 593630 955930 971576 > 1699 [i]