MinT - Best Known (114−83, 114, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (114−83, 114, s)-Nets in Base 16

(114−83, 114, 65)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (31, 114, 65)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 114, 65)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
    - the Hermitian function field over F₁₆ [i]

(114−83, 114, 98)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive

(31, 114, 98)-net in base 16, using

6 times m-reduction [i] based on (31, 120, 98)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 96, 98)-net over F₃₂, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F₃₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(114−83, 114, 168)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (31, 114, 168)-net over F₁₆, using

net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 167)-sequence over F₁₆, using
- Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 168, using
  - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(114−83, 114, 2218)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (31, 114, 2219)-net in base 16, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (31, 113, 2219)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16^mÂ â‰¥ 11716 592382 227859 728189 814229 273032 740667 789642 221943 300729 040500 865777 984485 382119 290590 647776 556771 482506 009445 937607 573204 232652 344686 > 16¹¹³ [i]