Best Known (120−89, 120, s)-Nets in Base 16
(120−89, 120, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (31, 120, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 120, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(120−89, 120, 98)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(31, 120, 98)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 96, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
(120−89, 120, 168)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (31, 120, 168)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 167)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 168, using
(120−89, 120, 2052)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (31, 120, 2053)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (31, 119, 2053)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 196768 528277 765419 522470 725265 964302 222357 809126 688673 108109 987592 712574 194223 067032 738693 680418 899218 186712 320142 825339 201468 358055 091780 531456 > 16119 [i]