Best Known (31, 31+91, s)-Nets in Base 16
(31, 31+91, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (31, 122, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 122, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(31, 31+91, 76)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(31, 122, 76)-net in base 16, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on (31, 130, 76)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 104, 76)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 104, 76)-net over F32, using
(31, 31+91, 168)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (31, 122, 168)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 167)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 168, using
(31, 31+91, 2006)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (31, 122, 2007)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (31, 121, 2007)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 50 365329 394610 330269 250240 163400 207662 672017 791869 550948 160347 751241 430890 071170 900354 201771 661342 269434 583551 574366 794015 889187 536022 987298 687976 > 16121 [i]