MinT - Best Known (35, 35+94, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (35, 35+94, s)-Nets in Base 16

(35, 35+94, 65)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (35, 129, 65)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 129, 65)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
    - the Hermitian function field over F₁₆ [i]

(35, 35+94, 104)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive

(35, 129, 104)-net in base 16, using

1 times m-reduction [i] based on (35, 130, 104)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 104, 104)-net over F₃₂, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F₃₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(35, 35+94, 193)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (35, 129, 193)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 129, 193)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 192)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 193, using
    - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(35, 35+94, 2445)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (35, 129, 2446)-net in base 16, because

the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16^mÂ â‰¥ 217489 445505 977801 269912 646042 203033 900657 955609 294317 167877 871127 574248 030384 142109 798374 264737 252912 715505 836780 153685 696473 631157 508754 835414 607079 870656 > 16¹²⁹ [i]