MinT - Best Known (126−95, 126, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (126−95, 126, s)-Nets in Base 16

(126−95, 126, 65)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (31, 126, 65)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 126, 65)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
    - the Hermitian function field over F₁₆ [i]

(126−95, 126, 76)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive

(31, 126, 76)-net in base 16, using

4 times m-reduction [i] based on (31, 130, 76)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 104, 76)-net over F₃₂, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F₃₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(126−95, 126, 168)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (31, 126, 168)-net over F₁₆, using

net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 167)-sequence over F₁₆, using
- Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 168, using
  - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(126−95, 126, 1925)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (31, 126, 1926)-net in base 16, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (31, 125, 1926)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16^mÂ â‰¥ 3 285988 343384 176308 890898 637079 352614 344537 340220 632307 333915 846003 045757 425553 403934 121021 504667 761159 406116 926143 721843 311466 411874 877111 855075 381056 > 16¹²⁵ [i]