Best Known (127−96, 127, s)-Nets in Base 16
(127−96, 127, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (31, 127, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 127, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(127−96, 127, 76)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(31, 127, 76)-net in base 16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (31, 130, 76)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 104, 76)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 104, 76)-net over F32, using
(127−96, 127, 168)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (31, 127, 168)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 167)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 168, using
(127−96, 127, 1890)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (31, 127, 1891)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 853 000138 230299 669743 972510 721718 248270 332998 900190 437948 617230 444251 739811 716524 247051 509355 839776 833842 714041 797520 447369 456075 369067 725975 842549 809196 > 16127 [i]