Best Known (39, 100, s)-Nets in Base 16
(39, 100, 103)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (39, 100, 103)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 33, 38)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (6, 67, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (3, 33, 38)-net over F16, using
(39, 100, 128)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(39, 100, 128)-net in base 16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (39, 102, 128)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 68, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 68, 128)-net over F64, using
(39, 100, 208)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (39, 100, 208)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (37, 100, 208)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 207)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 208, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 207)-sequence over F16, using
(39, 100, 7539)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (39, 100, 7540)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (39, 99, 7540)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 161689 829092 086612 106971 652990 595463 354897 710384 060005 835859 897115 974621 435002 509965 861505 079031 178835 497273 555766 472376 > 1699 [i]