Best Known (54, 101, s)-Nets in Base 16
(54, 101, 520)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 101, 520)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (54, 102, 520)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 51, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 51, 260)-net over F256, using
(54, 101, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (54, 101, 642)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (54, 104, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 52, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 52, 321)-net over F256, using
(54, 101, 108048)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 101, 108049)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (54, 100, 108049)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 582500 328653 146750 446896 901847 291587 228266 602365 673797 614120 804978 845353 441997 669414 696357 113719 516458 860216 190959 750656 > 16100 [i]