Best Known (71, 101, s)-Nets in Base 16
(71, 101, 1052)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (71, 101, 1052)-net over F16, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 11, 24)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (15, 30, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 15, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 15, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (30, 60, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 30, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 30, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (1, 11, 24)-net over F16, using
(71, 101, 12168)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (71, 101, 12168)-net over F16, using
(71, 101, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (71, 101, large)-net in base 16, because
- 28 times m-reduction [i] would yield (71, 73, large)-net in base 16, but