Best Known (54, 105, s)-Nets in Base 16
(54, 105, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 105, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (54, 106, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 53, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 53, 258)-net over F256, using
(54, 105, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (54, 105, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (54, 106, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 53, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 53, 289)-net over F256, using
(54, 105, 69276)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 105, 69277)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (54, 104, 69277)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 169240 455819 968562 754643 841984 108102 006054 688334 058640 810831 160707 322009 911622 629132 678311 929827 683954 706310 318817 521989 543876 > 16104 [i]