Best Known (55, 105, s)-Nets in Base 16
(55, 105, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (55, 105, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (55, 106, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 53, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 53, 259)-net over F256, using
(55, 105, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (55, 105, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (55, 106, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 53, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 53, 321)-net over F256, using
(55, 105, 77403)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (55, 105, 77404)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 707931 382429 087324 394150 247703 762935 469406 319878 707254 752071 381249 451984 354388 942472 864631 202660 816106 037938 540931 557046 576501 > 16105 [i]