Best Known (64, 106, s)-Nets in Base 16
(64, 106, 538)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 106, 538)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 22, 24)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (42, 84, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 42, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 42, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (1, 22, 24)-net over F16, using
(64, 106, 1417)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (64, 106, 1417)-net over F16, using
(64, 106, 692361)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 106, 692362)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 43 323186 615180 988602 031358 125508 817015 155344 605309 405764 111191 358462 231505 547284 451748 165658 033310 287603 858732 113024 953590 812656 > 16106 [i]