Best Known (79, 109, s)-Nets in Base 16
(79, 109, 1285)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (79, 109, 1285)-net over F16, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 19, 257)-net over F16, using
- base reduction for projective spaces (embedding PG(9,256) in PG(18,16)) for nets [i] based on digital (0, 10, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- base reduction for projective spaces (embedding PG(9,256) in PG(18,16)) for nets [i] based on digital (0, 10, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (15, 30, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 15, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 15, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (30, 60, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 30, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 30, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (9, 19, 257)-net over F16, using
(79, 109, 26128)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (79, 109, 26128)-net over F16, using
(79, 109, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (79, 109, large)-net in base 16, because
- 28 times m-reduction [i] would yield (79, 81, large)-net in base 16, but