Best Known (29, 111, s)-Nets in Base 16
(29, 111, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 111, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 111, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(29, 111, 76)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(29, 111, 76)-net in base 16, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on (29, 120, 76)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 96, 76)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 96, 76)-net over F32, using
(29, 111, 161)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (29, 111, 161)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 160)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 29 and N(F) ≥ 161, using
(29, 111, 1935)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 111, 1936)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 46 313442 209851 862032 906992 734156 351828 932810 214161 290534 376445 401241 563552 846603 670111 870751 731194 973325 683841 560550 760056 354464 179516 > 16111 [i]