Best Known (58, 111, s)-Nets in Base 16
(58, 111, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (58, 111, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (58, 112, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 56, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 56, 259)-net over F256, using
(58, 111, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (58, 111, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (58, 112, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 56, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 56, 321)-net over F256, using
(58, 111, 87394)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (58, 111, 87395)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (58, 110, 87395)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 839512 078160 917678 222182 737371 867997 758818 799904 323113 571334 699683 290589 991444 768810 407920 912547 037381 429996 321242 368919 291906 174676 > 16110 [i]