Best Known (31, 112, s)-Nets in Base 16
(31, 112, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (31, 112, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 112, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(31, 112, 98)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(31, 112, 98)-net in base 16, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on (31, 120, 98)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 96, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 96, 98)-net over F32, using
(31, 112, 168)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (31, 112, 168)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 167)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 168, using
(31, 112, 2285)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (31, 112, 2286)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (31, 111, 2286)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 45 950991 599862 987233 071402 682850 569883 240439 948811 839717 472150 051032 293805 246607 324024 437460 029248 547314 429879 039839 558966 381096 237101 > 16111 [i]