Best Known (58, 113, s)-Nets in Base 16
(58, 113, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (58, 113, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (58, 114, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 57, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 57, 258)-net over F256, using
(58, 113, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (58, 113, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (58, 114, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 57, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 57, 289)-net over F256, using
(58, 113, 71960)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (58, 113, 71961)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (58, 112, 71961)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 726 970180 778745 191679 044113 269175 116320 182423 514421 621751 033439 963100 935209 804511 098417 919300 729935 274063 795949 323286 920150 834355 149056 > 16112 [i]