Best Known (69, 114, s)-Nets in Base 16
(69, 114, 547)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (69, 114, 547)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 24, 33)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 32)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 32)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (45, 90, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 45, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 45, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (2, 24, 33)-net over F16, using
(69, 114, 1538)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (69, 114, 1538)-net over F16, using
(69, 114, 923749)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (69, 114, 923750)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (69, 113, 923750)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 11629 547299 699696 887687 739970 755987 268820 197561 204232 728388 609090 686145 445801 848365 161328 323010 221566 392585 871429 465353 266004 965241 259376 > 16113 [i]