Best Known (28, 115, s)-Nets in Base 16
(28, 115, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (28, 115, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 115, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(28, 115, 76)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(28, 115, 76)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 92, 76)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
(28, 115, 156)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (28, 115, 156)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (27, 115, 156)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 155)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 27 and N(F) ≥ 156, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 155)-sequence over F16, using
(28, 115, 1728)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (28, 115, 1729)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (28, 114, 1729)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 186691 470194 307899 668578 752357 670369 549285 184669 013121 104833 505640 078465 657197 292996 787182 814421 710774 538180 893289 399588 108887 736315 899456 > 16114 [i]