Best Known (64, 125, s)-Nets in Base 16
(64, 125, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 125, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (64, 126, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 63, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 63, 258)-net over F256, using
(64, 125, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (64, 125, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (64, 126, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 63, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 63, 289)-net over F256, using
(64, 125, 76143)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 125, 76144)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (64, 124, 76144)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 204630 865007 016847 359285 447171 931109 391782 683024 908928 077588 029284 987607 063313 802283 441810 767597 638738 973673 280834 109273 528908 578842 836892 897741 645426 > 16124 [i]