Best Known (37, 128, s)-Nets in Base 16
(37, 128, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (37, 128, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 128, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(37, 128, 120)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(37, 128, 120)-net in base 16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (37, 130, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 104, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 104, 120)-net over F32, using
(37, 128, 208)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (37, 128, 208)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 207)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 208, using
(37, 128, 2915)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (37, 128, 2916)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (37, 127, 2916)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 847 660891 216616 812321 300466 373690 545932 619744 700764 386804 387228 707023 417052 044484 786258 812886 570313 506916 623968 731687 298878 029855 679291 630028 657465 444176 > 16127 [i]