Best Known (86, 128, s)-Nets in Base 16
(86, 128, 1030)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 128, 1030)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 42, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 21, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 21, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (44, 86, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 43, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 43, 258)-net over F256, using
- digital (21, 42, 514)-net over F16, using
(86, 128, 6201)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (86, 128, 6201)-net over F16, using
(86, 128, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 128, large)-net in base 16, because
- 40 times m-reduction [i] would yield (86, 88, large)-net in base 16, but