MinT - Best Known (38, 129, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (38, 129, s)-Nets in Base 16

(38, 129, 65)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (38, 129, 65)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 129, 65)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
    - the Hermitian function field over F₁₆ [i]

(38, 129, 120)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive

(38, 129, 120)-net in base 16, using

t-expansion [i] based on (37, 129, 120)-net in base 16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (37, 130, 120)-net in base 16, using
  - base change [i] based on digital (11, 104, 120)-net over F₃₂, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F₃₂, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
        a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(38, 129, 208)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (38, 129, 208)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (37, 129, 208)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 207)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 208, using
    - Drinfeld modules of rank 1 [i]

(38, 129, 3102)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (38, 129, 3103)-net in base 16, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 128, 3103)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16^mÂ â‰¥ 13582 820096 830779 210335 068316 000509 910564 122850 680841 752640 375988 754898 945493 123055 372061 181832 176864 650771 481979 025373 136204 276273 375182 171749 296456 499776 > 16¹²⁸ [i]