Best Known (23, 130, s)-Nets in Base 16
(23, 130, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 130, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 130, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(23, 130, 129)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (23, 130, 129)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 130, 129)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
(23, 130, 1141)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 130, 1142)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 129, 1142)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 219952 534884 193151 937861 373028 181775 329418 336479 175081 881668 396347 530605 029066 173814 556207 423516 097732 782419 823486 588258 889083 078020 544099 540359 054243 431541 > 16129 [i]