Best Known (69, 130, s)-Nets in Base 16
(69, 130, 522)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (69, 130, 522)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 65, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
(69, 130, 644)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (69, 130, 644)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(16130, 644, F16, 2, 61) (dual of [(644, 2), 1158, 62]-NRT-code), using
- 2 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(16126, 642, F16, 2, 61) (dual of [(642, 2), 1158, 62]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (65, 126, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 63, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 63, 321)-net over F256, using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (65, 126, 642)-net over F16, using
- 2 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(16126, 642, F16, 2, 61) (dual of [(642, 2), 1158, 62]-NRT-code), using
(69, 130, 120879)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (69, 130, 120880)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (69, 129, 120880)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 214530 713572 960870 282183 395010 487873 018650 471499 371059 747653 336811 583927 465492 269554 046641 831924 352493 503800 218238 731222 022747 759152 775869 100553 035905 039126 > 16129 [i]