Best Known (8, 21, s)-Nets in Base 16
(8, 21, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (8, 21, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 21, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(8, 21, 80)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(8, 21, 80)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 14, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
(8, 21, 81)-Net in Base 16
(8, 21, 81)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 14, 81)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 80)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 80)-sequence over F64, using
(8, 21, 2057)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (8, 21, 2058)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (8, 20, 2058)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 1 212146 256864 075952 328596 > 1620 [i]