Best Known (24, 42, s)-Nets in Base 16
(24, 42, 520)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 42, 520)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 21, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
(24, 42, 643)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (24, 42, 643)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(1642, 643, F16, 2, 18) (dual of [(643, 2), 1244, 19]-NRT-code), using
- 1 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(1640, 642, F16, 2, 18) (dual of [(642, 2), 1244, 19]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (22, 40, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 20, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 20, 321)-net over F256, using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (22, 40, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(1640, 642, F16, 2, 18) (dual of [(642, 2), 1244, 19]-NRT-code), using
(24, 42, 115045)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 42, 115046)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 374 160802 148838 276075 206288 518567 327690 308786 816436 > 1642 [i]