Best Known (17, 52, s)-Nets in Base 16
(17, 52, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (17, 52, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 52, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(17, 52, 76)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(17, 52, 76)-net in base 16, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on (17, 60, 76)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 48, 76)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 48, 76)-net over F32, using
(17, 52, 112)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (17, 52, 112)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 111)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 112, using
(17, 52, 1950)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (17, 52, 1951)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (17, 51, 1951)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 25 780820 799690 451896 669217 917290 515158 204728 982309 382616 515606 > 1651 [i]