Best Known (29, 60, s)-Nets in Base 16
(29, 60, 130)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 60, 130)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (29, 63, 130)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 23, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (6, 40, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16 (see above)
- digital (6, 23, 65)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(29, 60, 192)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(29, 60, 192)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on (9, 40, 192)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (9, 42, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 36, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 36, 192)-net over F128, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (9, 42, 192)-net in base 64, using
(29, 60, 207)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (29, 60, 207)-net over F16, using
(29, 60, 209)-Net in Base 16
(29, 60, 209)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 40, 209)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 208)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 209, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 208)-sequence over F64, using
(29, 60, 23320)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 60, 23321)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 59, 23321)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 110486 933553 010146 159189 338617 189090 052251 676064 159338 150953 349965 608976 > 1659 [i]