Best Known (36, 61, s)-Nets in Base 16
(36, 61, 524)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 61, 524)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (36, 62, 524)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 31, 262)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 261)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 31, 262)-net over F256, using
(36, 61, 770)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (36, 61, 770)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1661, 770, F16, 25) (dual of [770, 709, 26]-code), using
- 121 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 15 times 0, 1, 34 times 0, 1, 60 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1654, 642, F16, 25) (dual of [642, 588, 26]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25627, 321, F256, 25) (dual of [321, 294, 26]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,295P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25627, 321, F256, 25) (dual of [321, 294, 26]-code), using
- 121 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 15 times 0, 1, 34 times 0, 1, 60 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1654, 642, F16, 25) (dual of [642, 588, 26]-code), using
(36, 61, 369711)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 61, 369712)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 60, 369712)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 1 766890 002810 686676 032036 142856 323306 255296 343806 139405 047439 055335 720211 > 1660 [i]