Best Known (18, 63, s)-Nets in Base 16
(18, 63, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (18, 63, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 63, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(18, 63, 76)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(18, 63, 76)-net in base 16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 65, 76)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 52, 76)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 52, 76)-net over F32, using
(18, 63, 113)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (18, 63, 113)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 112)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 113, using
(18, 63, 1481)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (18, 63, 1482)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (18, 62, 1482)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 455 601298 748246 912245 682588 624918 606911 556563 262217 844644 059018 394465 918736 > 1662 [i]