Best Known (27, 76, s)-Nets in Base 16
(27, 76, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 76, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 76, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(27, 76, 120)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(27, 76, 120)-net in base 16, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (27, 80, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 64, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 64, 120)-net over F32, using
(27, 76, 156)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (27, 76, 156)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 155)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 27 and N(F) ≥ 156, using
(27, 76, 3772)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 76, 3773)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 75, 3773)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 042033 296936 531354 240800 157437 520548 127300 836503 993522 016790 275824 578896 296857 538076 422881 > 1675 [i]