Best Known (37, 80, s)-Nets in Base 16
(37, 80, 130)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (37, 80, 130)-net over F16, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (37, 87, 130)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 31, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (6, 56, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16 (see above)
- digital (6, 31, 65)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(37, 80, 177)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(37, 80, 177)-net in base 16, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on (37, 90, 177)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 60, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 60, 177)-net over F64, using
(37, 80, 209)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (37, 80, 209)-net over F16, using
(37, 80, 225)-Net in Base 16
(37, 80, 225)-net in base 16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (37, 81, 225)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (10, 54, 225)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 224)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 224)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (10, 54, 225)-net over F64, using
(37, 80, 19585)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (37, 80, 19586)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (37, 79, 19586)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 133579 353307 487902 863418 010966 166534 974855 088488 528050 746552 095432 110918 840337 194579 883865 661216 > 1679 [i]