Best Known (22, 82, s)-Nets in Base 16
(22, 82, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (22, 82, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 82, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(22, 82, 76)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(22, 82, 76)-net in base 16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (22, 85, 76)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 68, 76)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 68, 76)-net over F32, using
(22, 82, 129)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (22, 82, 129)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 82, 129)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
(22, 82, 1553)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (22, 82, 1554)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 549 358341 916914 678264 139473 128074 605672 643555 398887 547967 317792 215887 585976 993012 587988 989052 306176 > 1682 [i]