MinT - Best Known (59, 82, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (59, 82, s)-Nets in Base 16

(59, 82, 1542)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (59, 82, 1542)-net over F₁₆, using

generalized (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (7, 14, 514)-net over F₁₆, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 7, 257)-net over F₂₅₆, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F₂₅₆, using
      - generalized Faure sequence [i]
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₅₆ with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
        the rational function field F₂₅₆(x) [i]
      - Niederreiter sequence [i]
2. digital (11, 22, 514)-net over F₁₆, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 11, 257)-net over F₂₅₆, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F₂₅₆ (see above)
3. digital (23, 46, 514)-net over F₁₆, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 23, 257)-net over F₂₅₆, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F₂₅₆ (see above)

(59, 82, 18582)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (59, 82, 18582)-net over F₁₆, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(59, 82, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (59, 82, large)-net in base 16, because

21 times m-reduction [i] would yield (59, 61, large)-net in base 16, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]