Best Known (48, 83, s)-Nets in Base 16
(48, 83, 526)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 83, 526)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (48, 84, 526)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 42, 263)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 262)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 42, 263)-net over F256, using
(48, 83, 803)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (48, 83, 803)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1683, 803, F16, 35) (dual of [803, 720, 36]-code), using
- 152 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (4, 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 27 times 0, 1, 44 times 0, 1, 56 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1674, 642, F16, 35) (dual of [642, 568, 36]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25637, 321, F256, 35) (dual of [321, 284, 36]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,285P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25637, 321, F256, 35) (dual of [321, 284, 36]-code), using
- 152 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (4, 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 27 times 0, 1, 44 times 0, 1, 56 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1674, 642, F16, 35) (dual of [642, 568, 36]-code), using
(48, 83, 307573)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 83, 307574)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (48, 82, 307574)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 546 821613 419048 762218 613420 389134 201448 150370 047576 709169 196494 008704 103218 952569 379232 750773 377621 > 1682 [i]