Best Known (24, 85, s)-Nets in Base 16
(24, 85, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 85, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 85, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(24, 85, 98)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(24, 85, 98)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 68, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
(24, 85, 129)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (24, 85, 129)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 85, 129)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
(24, 85, 1872)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 85, 1873)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 84, 1873)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 141005 359903 854459 579727 413755 369821 298352 408272 637612 391226 355847 500987 721920 387120 505777 283372 346976 > 1684 [i]