Best Known (44, 85, s)-Nets in Base 16
(44, 85, 516)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (44, 85, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (44, 86, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 43, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 43, 258)-net over F256, using
(44, 85, 578)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (44, 85, 578)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (44, 86, 578)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 43, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 43, 289)-net over F256, using
(44, 85, 63160)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (44, 85, 63161)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (44, 84, 63161)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 140013 565954 658173 585731 161556 215175 928976 642435 784635 795616 251935 248537 954900 347357 986330 018177 007926 > 1684 [i]