Best Known (25, 86, s)-Nets in Base 16
(25, 86, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (25, 86, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 86, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(25, 86, 98)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(25, 86, 98)-net in base 16, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (25, 90, 98)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 72, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 72, 98)-net over F32, using
(25, 86, 144)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (25, 86, 144)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 143)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 25 and N(F) ≥ 144, using
(25, 86, 2055)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (25, 86, 2056)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (25, 85, 2056)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 257911 372974 847940 196545 647983 177453 398013 827673 595302 358040 625471 254898 103089 319564 735507 958840 120576 > 1685 [i]